- online-crc.com
   
 
 
 
 
Subscribe Now!
About CRC
Home
Site Map
Help
Contact Us
About Platinum
Platinum Resources
Core Privileges
Benchmarking Reports
Clinical Privilege Update (E-News)
Policy and Procedures
Members Resources
Briefings on Credentialing
Clinical Privilege White Papers
Medical Staff Talk
Member Privileging Forms
Consulting Resources
CRC Consulting
White Papers
Advisors
Events
Free Resources
CRC Blog
Credentialing and
Privileging Advisor
Credentialing Links
New Tech Links
 
credentialing and privileging desk reference_verification resource
Visit our sister website for credentials verification help!
 

La Pine: Is There a Universal Credentialing Application in the USA?

Some may say that the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare's (CAQH) Universal Credentialing Data Source (UCD) is such a tool. 

 

On May 28, 2008, Mr. Sorin Davis, Executive Director, CAQH, presented an update to a group of Michigan Association Medical Staff Service members.  To get all participants at the same knowledge level, Mr. Davis gave a brief overview of the development of  CAQH which began in 1999 as a non-profit business entity.  The philosophy of development of the UCD is credentialing is a 3-step process:  1) application, 2) primary source verification (PSV), and 3) review and decision.  UCD is the answer to providers' problems which were identified as:  redundancy – how many applications are 1 too many?, the lengthy process, and no consistent recredentialing cycle.  For those who may be thinking that the “process” time is not all that long, let me explain the issues involved.  The necessary follow-up required to complete an application may be based on omissions, or data elements not completed, problems with legibility, use of unfamiliar abbreviations, and incomplete work history dates.

 

All these require contact with the provide to clarify or complete the application before PSV can be completed.  How much time does this take?  It depends on the success in contacting the provider.  The time could be short with a mere telephone call or significantly long if the provider is relocating.  On average, the processing of an application is about 60 days.  According to statistics provided by Mr. Davis time and expense is broken down into 40% data collection (completing an application), 25% PSV, and 35% review and decision.

 

CAQH's goal is to use technology to ease the credentialing by creating a single on-line data source tool to import data into a central database, allowing providers to own their data.  CAQH requires that updates to the information be at least every 120 days.  As of May 22, 2008, 590,000 providers are registered with 505,000 complete applications (along with required documents) already in the database.  Four hundred healthplan organizations are currently using the CAQH application.  All Vermont hospitals and George Washington University are current users.

 

News Items:

CAQH is looking into the possibilities of allowing facilities to upload provider information into the CAQH database.  The issue will be how to maintain current information and how to resolve the issue of providers attesting to the accuracy of the data.

 

Hospitals are now considering participation and several state Medicaid programs are in the discussion stage of requiring providers to enroll in UCD.  An interesting incentive for hospital participation is the “association model” where several hospitals could form an arrangement to pool their responsibilities for the administrative charge ($5,000 for the first year, and $3,000 for every following year).  This cost would be divided among the participating hospitals at a considerable savings to all.

 

CAQH will be conducting a number of quality evaluations to determine the accuracy of the data in the database.

 

Considering that the UCD is up and running, that providers are voluntarily participating, several payors are requiring participation, will the CAQH UCD become the universal application?

 

What's your opinion?

 

Carole La Pine, MSA, CPMSM, CPCS

Comments
I'd like to hear from med staff professionals in Vermont.
How long have they used this application? How is it working for them?
# Posted By Bev_Osborne | 6/3/08 4:25 PM
I have used the CAQH for managed care credentialing and I consider it a very convenient way of
maintaining current credentialing status with the insurance carriers that already participate with CAQH.
Once the standardized credentialing application for your state is in and all expirations are kept updated,
the carriers take care of retrieving the application and all information to credential or re-credential
the physicians. It is my hope that more insurance companies jump in the band wagon soon. Maybe in the
future CAQH can also allow hospitals and other entities to participate in it.
# Posted By Ive_Ammoune | 6/5/08 4:34 PM
I was at the meeting in Michigan where Mr Davis presented CAQH, it was very well presented. The multi-specialty group that I credential for uses CAQH and we encourage payers, even those not subscribing to CAQH to accept the printed form rather than the old standard form. Our hope is that as more payers trust the CAQH information and perhaps additional documentation is loaded on the front end of any application, the turn around time for a provider to begin to see patients will become less. The fact that info has to be reattested and documentation kept up to date is something that makes this form of data sharing a good one. We look forward to more data sharing and a better ways to provide quality, safe, professional medical care to the public in a much more timely manner.
# Posted By Corinne_Roosen | 12/24/08 8:46 AM
About HCPro | Privacy Statement | Contact Us
Copyright © 2009 Credentialing Resource Center.